EIGRP Features
Enhanced IGRP (EIGRP) is a classless, enhanced distance-vector protocol that gives us a real edge over another Cisco proprietary protocol, Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (IGRP). That’s basically why it’s called Enhanced IGRP. Like IGRP, EIGRP uses the concept of an autonomous system to describe the set of contiguous routers that run the same routing protocol and share routing information. But unlike IGRP, EIGRP includes the subnet mask in its route updates. And as you now know, the advertisement of subnet information allows us to use VLSM and summarization when designing our networks!
EIGRP is
sometimes referred to as a hybrid routing protocol because it has
characteristics of both distance-vector and link-state protocols. For example,
EIGRP doesn’t send link-state packets as OSPF does; instead, it sends
traditional distance-vector updates containing information about networks plus
the cost of reaching them from the perspective of the advertising router. And
EIGRP has link-state characteristics as well-it synchronizes routing tables
between neighbors at startup, and then sends specific updates only when
topology changes occur. This makes EIGRP suitable for very large networks. EIGRP
has a maximum hop count of 255. There are a number of powerful features that
make EIGRP a real standout from IGRP and other protocols. The main ones are
listed here:
_Support
for IP, IPX, and AppleTalk via protocol-dependent modules
_Considered
classless (same as RIPv2 and OSPF)
_Support
for VLSM/CIDR
_Support
for summaries and discontiguous networks
_Efficient
neighbor discovery
_Communication
via Reliable Transport Protocol (RTP)
_Best path
selection via Diffusing Update Algorithm (DUAL)
One of the
most interesting features of EIGRP is that it provides routing support for
multiple Network layer protocols: IP, IPX, and AppleTalk. The only other
routing protocol that comes close and supports multiple network layer protocols
is Intermediate System-to-Intermediate System (IS-IS), but it only supports IP
and Connectionless Network Service (CLNS). EIGRP supports different Network
layer protocols through the use of protocol-dependent modules (PDMs). Each
EIGRP PDM will maintain a separate series of tables containing the routing
information that applies to a specific protocol. What this means to you is that
there will be IP/EIGRP tables, IPX/EIGRP tables, and AppleTalk/EIGRP tables.
Before
EIGRP routers are willing to exchange routes with each other, they must become neighbors.
There are three conditions that must be met for neighborship establishment:
_Hello or
ACK received
_AS numbers
match
_Identical
metrics (K values)
Link-state
protocols tend to use Hello messages to establish neighborship (also called
adjacencies) because they normally do not send out periodic route updates, and
there has to be some mechanism to help neighbors realize when a new peer has
moved in, or an old one has left or gone down. To maintain the neighborship
relationship, EIGRP routers must also continue receiving Hellos from their
neighbors.
EIGRP
routers that belong to different autonomous systems (ASes) don’t automatically
share routing information and they don’t become neighbors. This behavior can be
a real benefit when used in larger networks to reduce the amount of route
information propagated through a specific AS. The only catch is that you might
have to take care of redistribution between the different ASes manually.
The only
time EIGRP advertises its entire routing table is when it discovers a new
neighbor and forms an adjacency with it through the exchange of Hello packets.
When this happens, both neighbors advertise their entire routing tables to one
another. After each has learned its neighbor’s routes, only changes to the
routing table are propagated from then on. When EIGRP routers receive their
neighbors’ updates, they store them in a local topology table. This table
contains all known routes from all known neighbors, and serves as the raw
material from which the best routes are selected and placed into the routing
table.
Let’s
define some terms:
Feasible
distance - This is
the best metric along all paths to a remote network, including the metric to
the neighbor that is advertising that remote network. This is the route that
you will find in the routing table, because it is considered the best path. The
metric of a feasible distance is the metric reported by the neighbor (called
reported distance), plus the metric to the neighbor reporting the route.
Reported
distance - This is
the metric of a remote network, as reported by a neighbor. It is also the
routing table metric of the neighbor, and is the same as the number after the
slash in the topology table.
Neighbor
table - Each
router keeps state information about adjacent neighbors. When a newly
discovered neighbor is learned, the address and interface of the neighbor are
recorded, and this information is held in the neighbor table, stored in RAM. There
is one neighbor table for each protocol-dependent module. Sequence numbers are
used to match acknowledgments with update packets. The last sequence number
received from the neighbor is recorded so that outof- order packets can be
detected.
Topology
table - The
topology table is populated by the protocol-dependent modules and acted upon by
the Diffusing Update Algorithm (DUAL). It contains all destinations advertised
by neighboring routers, holding each destination address and a list of
neighbors that have advertised the destination. For each neighbor, the
advertised metric is recorded, which comes only from the neighbor’s routing
table. If the neighbor is advertising this destination, it must be using the
route to forward packets.
Feasible
successor - A destination
entry is moved from the topology table to the routing table when there is a
feasible successor. A feasible successor is a path whose reported distance is
less than the feasible distance, and it is considered a backup route. EIGRP
will keep up to six feasible successors in the topology table. Only the one
with the best metric (the successor).is placed in the routing table. The show
ip eigrp topology command will display all the EIGRP feasible successor
routes known to a router.
Successor - A successor route (think
successful!) is the best route to a remote network. A successor route is used
by EIGRP to forward traffic to a destination and is stored in the routing
table. It is backed up by a feasible successor route that is stored in the
topology table-if one is available.
EIGRP uses
a proprietary protocol, called Reliable Transport Protocol (RTP), to manage the
communication of messages between EIGRP-speaking routers. And as the name
suggests, reliability is a key concern of this protocol. Cisco has designed a
mechanism that leverages multicasts and unicasts to deliver updates quickly,
and to track the receipt of the data. When EIGRP sends multicast traffic, it
uses the Class D address 224.0.0.10. Each EIGRP router is aware of who its
neighbors are, and for each multicast it sends out, it maintains a list of the
neighbors who have replied. If EIGRP doesn’t get a reply from a neighbor, it
will switch to using unicasts to resend the same data. If it still doesn’t get
a reply after 16 unicast attempts, the neighbor is declared dead. People often
refer to this process as reliable multicast. Routers keep track of the
information they send by assigning a sequence number to each packet. With this
technique, it’s possible for them to detect the arrival of old, redundant, or
outof- sequence information. Being able to do these things is highly important
because EIGRP is a quiet protocol. It depends upon its ability to synchronize
routing databases at startup time and then maintain the consistency of
databases over time by only communicating any changes. So the permanent loss of
any packets, or the out-of-order execution of packets, can result in corruption
of the routing database.
EIGRP uses
Diffusing Update Algorithm (DUAL) for selecting and maintaining the best path
to each remote network. This algorithm allows for the following:
_Backup
route determination if one is available
_Support of Variable-Length Subnet Masks (VLSMs)
_Dynamic
route recoveries
_Queries
for an alternate route if no route can be found
DUAL provides
EIGRP with possibly the fastest route convergence time among all protocols. The
key to EIGRP’s speedy convergence is twofold: First, EIGRP routers maintain a
copy of all of their neighbors’ routes, which they use to calculate their own
cost to each remote network. If the best path goes down, it may be as simple as
examining the contents of the topology table to select the best replacement
route. Secondly, if there isn’t a good alternative in the local topology table,
EIGRP routers very quickly ask their neighbors for help finding one.
EIGRP
includes a bunch of cool features that make it suitable for use in large
networks:
_Support
for multiple ASes on a single router
_Support
for VLSM and summarization
_Route
discovery and maintenance
EIGRP uses
autonomous system numbers to identify the collection of routers that share
route information. Only routers that have the same autonomous system numbers
share routes. In large networks, you can easily end up with really complicated
topology and route tables, and that can markedly slow convergence during
diffusing computation operations.
The use of
redistribution within EIGRP leads us to another interesting feature. Normally,
the administrative distance (AD) of an EIGRP route is 90, but this is true only
for what is known as an internal EIGRP route. These are routes originated
within a specific autonomous system by EIGRP routers that are members of the
same autonomous system. The other type of route is called an external EIGRP
route and has an AD of 170, which is not so good. These routes appear within
EIGRP route tables courtesy of either manual or automatic redistribution, and
they represent networks that originated outside of the EIGRP autonomous system.
And it doesn’t matter if the routes originated from another EIGRP autonomous
system or from another routing protocol such as OSPF-they’re all considered to
be external routes when redistributed within EIGRP.
Since you
need to migrate slowly over to EIGRP and cannot change all the routers
simultaneously, you need to configure redistribution-right? Not with EIGRP! As
long as you use the same autonomous system number for EIGRP that you used for
IGRP, EIGRP will automatically redistribute the routes from IGRP into EIGRP. Of
course, EIGRP will see these as external routes (AD of 170).
As one of
the more sophisticated classless routing protocols, EIGRP supports the use of
Variable- Length Subnet Masks. This is really important because it allows for
the conservation of address space through the use of subnet masks that more closely
fit the host requirements, such as using 30-bit subnet masks for point-to-point
networks. And because the subnet mask is propagated with every route update,
EIGRP also supports the use of discontiguous subnets, something that gives us a
lot more flexibility when designing the network’s IP address plan.
Discontiguous network has two or more subnetworks of a classful network
connected together by different classful networks. Fig. 29 displays a typical
discontiguous network. The subnets 172.16.248.0 and 172.16.251.0 are connected
together with a 10.10.0.0 network. By default, each router thinks it has the
only 172.16.0.0 network
Another
really sweet thing about EIGRP is that unlike many other protocols that use a
single factor to compare routes and select the best possible path, EIGRP can
use a combination of four:
_Bandwidth
_Delay
_Load
_Reliability
Like IGRP,
EIGRP uses only bandwidth and delay of the line to determine the best path to a
remote network by default. Cisco sometimes likes to call these path bandwidth
value and cumulative line delay-go figure. And it’s worth noting that there’s a
fifth element, maximum transmission unit (MTU) size. This element has never
been used in EIGRP calculations but it’s a required parameter in some EIGRP
related commands, especially those involving redistribution. The value of the
MTU element represents the smallest MTU value encountered along the path to the
destination network.
No comments:
Post a Comment